What makes the ex-HACTL2
Building
a good choice as EMSD's new headquarters?
The building fits our needs in terms of
location, size and space, and has the right structure. Relocating
here also allowed us to resolve several issues at once.
First, we had outgrown the limited space
and facilities that our old headquarters at Caroline Hill
could provide. We had been operating out of that building
for 40 years, during which time we had grown considerably,
both in the number of our personnel and the scope of our activities.
Second, the Caroline Hill site has now become a premium site
and our vacation from that site would create much more value
for the government. And third, the site of our Sung Wong Toi
vehicle workshop had become part of the South East Kowloon
Development Scheme at about the same time, so a replacement
workshop had to be found.
The ex-Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminal 2 (HACTL2)
building was vacated in 1998 after the airport moved to Chek
Lap Kok and hence had become available just when we needed
it. It was recommended to us by the Government Property Agency
and turned out to be an excellent choice as it suited our
needs in so many ways. Its convenient location, good size
and extra floor loading are perfect for our offices and workshops.
It also meets our requirements under the metre-for metre principle,
as its gross floor area of 80,000 square meters is roughly
the same as that of the Caroline Hill headquarters and Sung
Wong Toi workshop combined.
Relocating to Kowloon Bay has also had
another benefit. Being here, we have been able to surrender
our Kowloon Bay vehicle depot to the Government. So, by taking
up the HACTL2 building as our headquarters, we have released
three prime urban sites - in Caroline Hill, Sung Wong Toi
and Kowloon Bay - to the Government for more cost-effective
use.
You had to convert a cargo handling building
to accommodate offices and workshops. Describe the challenges
and cost involved.
We decided very early on that conversion
was preferable to demolition, mainly for environmental reasons
and also to save cost. We added one storey for extra office
space, dismantled certain cargo lifting facilities that were
no longer required, and carried out reprovisioning work to
accommodate our need for workshops, parking spaces and so
on. The original HACTL2 building was completed in the early
1990s and remained in good condition, so the conversion was
fairly smooth. The total conversion cost was HK$880 million,
in line with LegCo funding approved in 2001*.
How will the new headquarters enhance
EMSD's business and further its goals and mission?
A dedicated building that consolidates
all our operations under one roof will no doubt enhance our
efficiencies and internal communications to ultimately benefit
all our clients and stakeholders. The relocation was an opportunity
for us to modernise our equipment and facilities, most notably
in information technology, and gave us the space to build
a state-of-the-art data centre. We now also have better training
facilities for staff, plus a full range of exhibition and
education facilities to showcase how we have harnessed the
latest technologies to promote E&M safety and energy efficiency
in Hong Kong. We are also very fortunate to be able to showcase
a variety of cutting-edge renewable energy demonstration facilities
here at the new headquarters, which will be open to students
and the community via educational tours and programmes.
Looking back, how would you describe
the Caroline Hill headquarters era?
Caroline Hill witnessed the growth and
transformation of EMSD over four decades. It was our headquarters
between 1966 and 2005 and probably pre-dated 1966 as a vehicle
workshop.
In the 1950s and 1960s, the department
was best known for its vehicle workshops and vehicle maintenance
work, although we were also heavily involved in maintenance
of many other electrical and mechanical installations. The
key being the availability of craftsmen and skilled labour.
The 1970s ushered in the era of Regulatory Services, which
broadened our scope of work to include safeguarding the general
public through the development of a regulatory framework for
a host of E&M safety issues. This decade also saw much
progress in sewage disposal and solid waste incineration,
and we groomed many professionals who were later seconded
to the newly established Drainage Services Department. The
1980s saw the emergence of electronics and medical electronics,
and with the 1990s came the advent of energy efficiency and
conservation as we set up the Energy Efficiency Office in
1994.
Caroline Hill witnessed many chapters in
our development, which has been an upward shift from a focus
on skilled labour to one on professional and technical service
development, including engineering consultancy, while concurrently
growing in regulatory development and technology utilisation.
Has the relocation been a worthwhile exercise?
Definitely. The relocation has enabled
us to release three pieces of valuable land to the Government
for more cost-effective usage, and to keep and rejuvenate
HACTL2 for a new purpose. With enhanced public education facilities,
members of the community will also be able to directly benefit
from the new headquarters and gain more insight into the fascinating
and valuable work we do. Finally, for us as an organisation,
the move marks a new era in our development. Here we are in
a structure of great potential that gives us a platform to
modernise the department. It is a major morale booster for
staff too.
Ten or twenty years from now, what do you
think
staff will say about the headquarters?
I think EMSD will become more of a household
name in the next one or two decades and that people will associate
our organisation with our headquarters much more so than was
the case at Caroline Hill. So the new headquarters will be
a focus for staff pride as we engage more effectively with
the community, as we test new technology; and as we continuously
strive to uphold and upgrade our image.
*
|
Funding
arrangements for the new EMSD Headquarters project were
discussed and endorsed at a meeting of the Public Works
Subcommittee of the LegCo Finance Committee on 6 June
2001, on the basis of Paper No. PWSC(2001-02)46. |
|